There is no definitive answer to this question as it depends on a number of factors, including the size and complexity of the projects involved, the amount of data storage required, and the availability of specific AWS or DigitalOcean features. However, if we consider a few key factors, it is likely that DigitalOcean would be cheaper overall.
First, DigitalOcean offers lower prices for larger projects. For example, a 1-year plan for a small web server with 2GB of storage costs $5/month while a 2-year plan for the same server costs $10/month.
This is in contrast to AWS, where the smallest plan (1GB storage) costs $12.50/month.
Second, DigitalOcean has lower prices for less storage.
Third, DigitalOcean offers lower prices for servers with less memory and CPU.
Fourth, DigitalOcean provides more control over server configuration. For example, you can control the number of CPU cores and memory cards on a server.
This is not the case with AWS.
Overall, the factors listed above would likely lead to DigitalOcean being cheaper than AWS. However, it is important to consider the specific needs of each project, and to compare prices and features specifically for each platform.